An Imminent Crisis

What Henry Nowak's Interaction with Police Reveal

Some or all aspects of the Henry Nowak story may be false. I can’t blame anyone for questioning what has been reported. The safest bet, living in Clown World, is to assume everything is fake and gay. Because most narratives prove to be such.

For the sake of argument I’m going to ignore the foreign origin of the story, and assume what I’ve heard about it is all factual. Because this story, as it has been reported, perfectly encapsulates the status quo for the West in general and America in particular.

On a public street, a young white male is stabbed multiple times by a non-white foreign invader (or, at least, the offspring of foreign invaders; typically an invader is referred to as a “refugee” or “immigrant”).

(Where this murder took place, native citizens are prohibited from carrying weapons. But “the law” turns a blind eye to foreign invaders who carry weapons. Policy dictates that foreigners are not subjected to the same limitations that citizens are. This is a familiar pattern in Clown World.)

Police arrive. The foreign invader falsely claims that the victim racially harassed him. Policy dictates that the alleged racist remark, not attempted murder, is the crime which must be addressed. The police decide the victim is the criminal, arrest and handcuff him, ignoring his own counter-claim, while blood was likely filling his lungs. He dies of his stab wounds.

Why? Because the victim was a young white male, while the murderer was a member of a favored demographic.

Systemic racism exists, but it’s not what you have been told it is. This is how it actually manifests in the Current Year. Henry Nowak, as a young white male, was afforded no human dignity and had no evident protected rights. The murderer had rights which were honored. The most obvious was the right to use the police as a weapon against somebody he hated. Provided that the person in question was a young white male, of course.

It pretty much goes without saying, but I’m going to say it anyway: the police reaction would have been completely different if the victim had been an older, important white male like Keir Starmer, Chuck Schumer, or a million other scumbag politicians (and probable pedophiles). The police reaction would have been completely different if the victim had been another non-white. The police reaction would have been completely different if the victim had been carrying a Pride Flag. The police reaction would have been completely different if the victim had been female.

Because of his demographic, Nowak’s claim of being stabbed wasn’t worth taking seriously. Because of his demographic, the murderer’s false accusation against his victim was automatically taken seriously. Nobody would dare come right out and admit they consider young white men are subhuman, but actions speak louder than words. Disingenuous cowards have been speaking loud against white heterosexual males all their lives. And those young men have received the message. Some will accept it as Gospel. Others will reject it and embrace the opposite extreme. In fact, this is already happening.

For many years white heterosexual males just put up with it. We are the only demographic expected to just put up with abuse, discrimination and insults based on inherent qualities we have no control over, BTW. We just shrugged it off because we are also the only demographic without a tribal worldview, and because the implication was that if we made a stink about it, that would be racist and sexist—the two unforgivable sins in the Postwar Consensus Religion.

With the installation of Barack Hussein Obama into the highest office of the USA however, the accompanying zeitgeist abandoned all pretenses of seeking equality. Abandoned also was the subtlety that had masked the systemic prejudice from the average-IQ normies for so long. Tribalists never truly wanted equality. They wanted supremacy. And the mask slipped when one of their own (as they saw it) entered the White House and gave them delusions of invincibility. They turned up the temperature too fast and the frog jumped out of the pot.

They had been gradually heating the water in the pot for a long time. In junior high and high school, faculty and staff were disinterested in the racism directed at me, but they were righteously indignant when I had the audacity to notice out loud. That inspired lectures about how attitudes like mine were hateful and polarizing.

I have been passed over both in hiring, and for promotions, so that less-qualified females and minorities could fill open positions. Multiple aid packages were available that would have helped me pay tuition for college. Because of my academic performance, and my income level, I was qualified for countless scholarships. But my “identity” disqualified me, even as voices from every direction reminded me of how “privileged” I was. That was the 1990s. It’s only gotten worse since then.

“Diversity” was just becoming a buzz word back then. There are two definitions in use, currently. One is the kumbaya definition espoused in public for the benefit of the average-IQ normies. In reality, it means everybody is welcome except white heterosexual males. Everybody is worthy except white heterosexual males. Everybody is afforded human dignity except white heterosexual males. Because there’s something wrong with us. White heterosexual males are inherently evil you see—unworthy of fair treatment; deserving of abuse, disrespect and mockery. This is what white heterosexual males learn from 12 years in government schools, from ubiquitous pop culture, and from institutional policy.

The young boys who began learning this in elementary school, when the Obama Zeitgeist came out of the closet, are in their 20s now. Some adopted that worldview as their own and still cling to it. Others do not. While the world caters to women and minorities they are told by self-righteous cowards speaking from straight faces that they are privileged oppressors—not because of anything they’ve said or done, but because of their race and gender. No evidence (much less proof) of their sexism/racism is required, they learn, because their DNA and chromosomes ARE the proof.

It’s an abomination, but it should come as no surprise that some young white males in this godless, lawless Clown World pretend to be female. That not only elevates them from status as second-class citizens, but magically transforms them into heroes to be praised whenever their names are mentioned. If you’re born with the wrong DNA and hormones, that’s one of only two avenues to accessing the same human rights afforded to the foreign invaders who hate you. The other way is to make a lifestyle out of taking it up the poop chute.

Harvard’s admissions policy is illustrative, here. White male students have been systematically passed over for years, so that less-qualified non-white-males could be admitted. But nobody with a platform had the guts to mention it, until it was brought to their attention that Asian students were also suffering discrimination. THEN it was a big deal to consoivatives. Here’s a summary of how the arguments went during Peak Globohomo:

Pantywaist Neocons: “You claim to want racial justice and equal opportunity. Well, look at how your unfair quota system is impacting these poor Asians!”

Mainstream Marxists: “You racist oppressors! You’re only blowing the whistle on our discrimination against Asians because we’re also discriminating against white heterosexual males! Well, we can’t punish all of you, but we can damn sure punish these young privileged oppressors!”

(If memory serves, Harvard has recently dialed back its discrimination against Asians. But note that nobody claimed racial/sexual discrimination was wrong when white heterosexual males are the victims. In fact, the definition of racism has been changed in recent years to exclude hatred of whites. Why? Because not only does our DNA automatically make us oppressors, but it also grants us agency, you see. The agency so prominent in Affirmative Action hiring practices, in tuition assistance, and during Burn Loot Murder riots. The agency that Henry Nowak supposedly benefited from while dying of his stab wounds.

While today’s 20-something white heterosexual males were growing up, learning that they were second-class citizens in their own country, foreign invaders like Ilhan Omar were becoming millionaires and being given a pass (so far) for robbing Americans via fraud, and sent to Congress, where she declared that Islamic terrorism is not a threat, but white men are.

Our “justice” system agrees with Omar. The burden of proof is set by default to be solely upon the man in everything from domestic disputes to divorce court. If he can’t prove that the woman assaulted him unprovoked, neglected/abused their children, or whatever, the male is assumed guilty while the woman is assumed innocent.

Ilhan Omar was just regurgitating cultural Marxist dogma when she tried to label white men as a threat. But those who agree with her agitprop are well on their way to making it a self-fulfilling prophecy. History is full of lessons about what happens when large groups of restless, angry young men propagate. Put those angry young men in a position where they have nothing left to lose, and the situation becomes even more dangerous.

All it takes is an effective “strong man” leader to harness their anger, unite them around some cause (or even just his own personality) and focus their aggression and, well…again, this is the catalyst for most of the highlights of history.

Traditionally, there has been a finite list of solutions for large numbers of frustrated, disenfranchised young men—some more constructive than others.

1. “Just get married and have kids!” bleat the smug, self-styled sages who had a far less toxic dating pool to navigate. There is some historic validity in this. A good wife can transform a young man’s anger and a family can satisfy his restless energy. But the cultural Marxists have successfully supplanted the birds and the bees with a largely adversarial relationship between the sexes.

   

   Single men don’t want female adversaries, but nobody cares what they want or don’t want. Single women today are aggressive, narcissistic blowhards who are self-confident to the point of delusion. And if you think young men are frustrated and angry now, it will be much worse for the ones who get trapped in a marriage with an insufferable shrew. And while the Church should offer a godly alternative to Clown World’s traditions, the cowards behind the pulpit are just another part of the problem.

   

2. “Seek out strange new worlds,” Captain Kirk might advise. That was a constructive use of young male restlessness back when there were unknown lands to explore and settle. They harnessed that energy to build civilization from a rugged wilderness. It was often also sanctioned by governments.

   

   Today governments are far more interested in replacing young white heterosexual males with foreign invaders, and/or herding them into centralized urban shitholes, where every aspect of their lives can be controlled by the lawless oligarchy.

To read the rest of this article, visit the Virtual Pulp blog.